misc: Drop print_ implementation from non-romcc boards
Because we had no stack on romcc boards, we had a separate, not as
powerful clone of printk: print_*.
Back in the day, like more than half a decade ago, we migrated a lot
of boards to printk, but we never cleaned up the existing code to be
consistent. Instead, we worked around the problem with a very messy
console.h (nowadays the mess is hidden in romstage_console.c and
early_print.h)
This patch cleans up the generic code pieces to use printk() on all
non-ROMCC boards.
Our two remaining ROMCC boards are fixed up in this commit:
bifferos/bifferboard and dmp/vortex86ex.
Change-Id: I16676eeabe5c892c8e3c9f3c0cd3bae2e8fd74b6
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8115
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Wu <arw@dmp.com.tw>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
diff --git a/src/lib/ramtest.c b/src/lib/ramtest.c
index 03c4aa7..a29fa25 100644
--- a/src/lib/ramtest.c
+++ b/src/lib/ramtest.c
@@ -83,13 +83,7 @@
unsigned char failed, failures;
uint8_t verbose = 0;
-#if !defined(__ROMCC__)
printk(BIOS_DEBUG, "DRAM bitset write: 0x%08lx\n", start);
-#else
- print_debug("DRAM bitset write: 0x");
- print_debug_hex32(start);
- print_debug("\n");
-#endif
for (idx=0; idx<0x400; idx+=4) {
test_pattern(idx, &addr, &value);
write_phys(start + addr, value);
@@ -98,13 +92,7 @@
/* Make sure we don't read before we wrote */
phys_memory_barrier();
-#if !defined(__ROMCC__)
printk(BIOS_DEBUG, "DRAM bitset verify: 0x%08lx\n", start);
-#else
- print_debug("DRAM bitset verify: 0x");
- print_debug_hex32(start);
- print_debug("\n");
-#endif
failures = 0;
for (idx=0; idx<0x400; idx+=4) {
test_pattern(idx, &addr, &value);
@@ -113,20 +101,10 @@
failed = (value2 != value);
failures |= failed;
if (failed && !verbose) {
-#if !defined(__ROMCC__)
printk(BIOS_ERR, "0x%08lx wr: 0x%08lx rd: 0x%08lx FAIL\n",
start + addr, value, value2);
-#else
- print_err_hex32(start + addr);
- print_err(" wr: 0x");
- print_err_hex32(value);
- print_err(" rd: 0x");
- print_err_hex32(value2);
- print_err(" FAIL\n");
-#endif
}
if (verbose) {
-#if !defined(__ROMCC__)
if ((addr & 0x0f) == 0)
printk(BIOS_DEBUG, "%08lx wr: %08lx rd:",
start + addr, value);
@@ -136,39 +114,14 @@
printk(BIOS_DEBUG, " %08lx ", value2);
if ((addr & 0x0f) == 0xc)
printk(BIOS_DEBUG, "\n");
-#else
- if ((addr & 0x0f) == 0) {
- print_dbg_hex32(start + addr);
- print_dbg(" wr: ");
- print_dbg_hex32(value);
- print_dbg(" rd: ");
- }
- print_dbg_hex32(value2);
- if (failed)
- print_dbg("! ");
- else
- print_dbg(" ");
- if ((addr & 0x0f) == 0xc)
- print_dbg("\n");
-#endif
}
}
if (failures) {
post_code(0xea);
-#if !defined(__ROMCC__)
printk(BIOS_DEBUG, "\nDRAM did _NOT_ verify!\n");
-#else
- print_debug("\nDRAM did _NOT_ verify!\n");
-#endif
return 1;
- }
- else {
-#if !defined(__ROMCC__)
+ } else {
printk(BIOS_DEBUG, "\nDRAM range verified.\n");
-#else
- print_debug("\nDRAM range verified.\n");
- return 0;
-#endif
}
return 0;
}
@@ -181,20 +134,10 @@
* test than a "Is my DRAM faulty?" test. Not all bits
* are tested. -Tyson
*/
-#if !defined(__ROMCC__)
printk(BIOS_DEBUG, "Testing DRAM at: %08lx\n", start);
-#else
- print_debug("Testing DRAM at: ");
- print_debug_hex32(start);
- print_debug("\n");
-#endif
if (ram_bitset_nodie(start))
die("DRAM ERROR");
-#if !defined(__ROMCC__)
printk(BIOS_DEBUG, "Done.\n");
-#else
- print_debug("Done.\n");
-#endif
}
@@ -206,20 +149,10 @@
* test than a "Is my DRAM faulty?" test. Not all bits
* are tested. -Tyson
*/
-#if !defined(__ROMCC__)
printk(BIOS_DEBUG, "Testing DRAM at : %08lx\n", start);
-#else
- print_debug("Testing DRAM at : ");
- print_debug_hex32(start);
- print_debug("\n");
-#endif
ret = ram_bitset_nodie(start);
-#if !defined(__ROMCC__)
printk(BIOS_DEBUG, "Done.\n");
-#else
- print_debug("Done.\n");
-#endif
return ret;
}